Wanted Equilibrium

I’ve just watched Wanted and I watched Equilibrium some time ago (probably twice or thrice maybe). Don’t even ask why I wanna compare these two – I guess you wouldn’t if you’d seen them both. 🙂 So… Wanted or Equilibrium? The latter in my eyes and by far. Now when I revealed my uber-objective result let me elaborate. Only a little, I don’t wanna push it too long this evening. I’m quite a bad judge of movies to be honest – I generally like something and appreciate the effort.

To make it clear, I gave Wanted 7 and Equilibrium 8 on IMDB – and so I’ve just joined the crowd (7 or 7.8 respectively). I enjoyed both of them. But anyway you look at it Equilibrium is more serious, more deep, it’s about something (freedom? 1984 reminiscence?) and it was first! 😉 There must be some reason why users on IMDB see it similar – especially if we’re talking about “the Equilibrium like scene”. Neither of these films made it into my TOP selection, but I simply liked the Equilibrium more. The conflict inside the main hero’s soul and the whole story was much stronger than the troubles of the wanted guy (yeah, I probably forgot they wanted him dead ;-)). I’m quite lucky that I’m not that ultra-critical and I can enjoy movies with weaker plot fixed by average (or better) acting and good effects. Good effects are now more and more standard, so I’ll be probably satisfied in the future. While Equilibrium was obviously influenced by the Matrix, Wanted was influenced by the Equilibrium and Matrix and I while bullet-time is now more and more cliche it’s something that makes many scenes more enjoyable. Sometimes even funny (ok, I really didn’t wanna mix Shrek into this article ;-)).

That said… another nice evening with enjoyable movie is behind me. I don’t give a damn that critics didn’t like Equilibrium, IMDB users obviously did. I don’t give a damn if you think I’m simple man when I enjoyed Wanted. Scenes like “Time to say goodbay”/”I’m sorry” simply were more than satisfying and while I don’t like Angelina dying I liked this movie in overall. It’s not the recommendation – it’s just the fact. For me. 😉

I can’t correct myself

I don’t often change my mind but sometimes I want to adjust my opinion a bit. To correct or clarify statements or to change rating or whatever. I tend to shift ratings on IMDB a bit roughly in one case out of ten. Plus-minus one star of course. No problem there. Recently I was on YouTube watching John Miles’ “Music” and I checked more videos. One of them looked like some studio-live video-clip (you know, it’s actually played like live on the stage, but in the studio without any crowd) but the music was for sure from album. I rated it 4/5 at first because at least the sound was good and video was fine too. Next click to related video – the same video with different sound. What the heck… this sounded more authentic, it was different version with the same video. When I clicked back to the previous one I realized that the A/V is out of sync! A wanted to shift my rating to 3/5 or maybe even 2/5 (out of sync?! blah!) but I was informed that I already rated the video and I can’t do it again.

It was a surprise for me and I can’t really understand why I can’t correct myself. I see no additional value in the system of one-time decision. Heck – I could even click the wrong star by accident (call me stupid ;-)). The same goes for forums although here I can understand missing edit feature. I don’t know if phpBB rules the world of on-line forums, but at least it’s pretty close to it. And it does have the “edit” option for your posts – for a reason. I rarely see edit to be misused by some user to completely change his/her post (can’t remember any case actually). Within proper community it can’t even work in the long term because trusted users with good reputation will notice, point it out and the bad user can be easily expelled (banned or removed). You can also use “quote” to include original post into your answer. Still edit is there so you can fix your typos or clarify some statements. Many people re-read their posts when they are already submitted (me too). And there is little note about last use of edit at the end of the post so the other users know anyway.

Google groups service doesn’t provide edit feature – but there’s a reason for that. Rather technical this time. It seems to work like news-groups – it’s based on emails – and you obviously can’t edit emails when they are sent. I can understand this. I could even live without edit feature on forum boards (some of them don’t have it anyway). But there is nothing inherently wrong with correcting yourself behindhand. Especially when we’re talking about clicking on stars (rating). Or am I wrong? Will I correct myself later? And – will it be allowed? 🙂